Public decision list January 6, 2026

Present:
Suzanne Otters-Bruijnen, mayor

Jelle de Jong, Alderman

Jan Boersma, Alderman

Steven Grevink, Alderman

Jeroen Wesselink, Secretary

1. Public list of decisions by the Municipality of Son en Breugel, December 16, 2025

The college adopts the decision list.

2. Internal—non-public—list of decisions December 16, 2025

The college adopts the decision list.

3. Opinion on the draft Regional Policy Plan 2027-2030 VRBZO

Under the Safety Regions Act (Wvr), every safety region is required to draw up a regional policy plan. The plan sets out the policy with regard to the tasks of the safety region.
The Joint Arrangement for the Brabant-Zuidoost Safety Region 2024 (GR VRBZO 2024) includes a consultation procedure for the Regional Policy Plan to be adopted. At the meeting of the VRBZO General Board on December 17, 2025, the draft Regional Policy Plan 2027-2030 VRBZO was adopted and released for consultation. For information and consideration, VRBZO also sent the 2027 Framework Memorandum to the council.

The council decides to propose to the municipal council:

to submit an opinion on the draft Regional Policy Plan 2027-2030 for the Brabant-Zuidoost Safety Region and to inform VRBZO of this in a letter;
take note of the 2027 VRBZO Framework Memorandum.

4. (Re)development of the Veerstraat 21-19-15 and Stakenburgstraat 18 site; 'preconditions and principles'

On November 23, 2023, the municipal council decided that it would have an advisory role in the informal process phase if there was a deviation from the environmental vision or environmental plan and if there was a BOPA procedure involving the addition of 26 or more homes.
On December 11, 2025, an advisory session was held with the municipal council on the preconditions and principles for the redevelopment site at Veerstraat 21-19-15 and Stakenburgstraat 18. This advice has been incorporated into the now final proposed 'preconditions and principles'.
Your council is asked to approve the 'preconditions and principles for the (re)development of the Veerstraat 21-19-15 and Stakenburgstraat 18 site'. On this basis, the initiator Ruimte voor Ruimte and its advisors are invited to come up with a detailed plan.

The council decides:

the preconditions and principles for the (re)development of the location at Veerstraat 21-19-15 and Stakenburgstraat 18 for the redevelopment of the location at Veerstraat 21-19-15 and Stakenburgstraat 18; to be determined;
to inform the Ruimte voor Ruimte development company in writing about the 'preconditions and principles for the (re)development of the Veerstraat 21-19-15 and Stakenburgstraat 18 site' and to request that it draw up a detailed plan to implement these.

5. Adoption of amendment to Son en Breugel environmental plan, first amendment Breeakker northern section

On April 20, 2023, the municipal council established a right of first refusal on plots in Breeakker (northern section). This right of first refusal expires on April 19, 2026. In order to extend the right of first refusal (beyond April 19, 2026), so that the municipality can retain control over future developments in this area, it is necessary for the municipal council to adopt a resolution by April 19, 2026, at the latest, to amend the 'Son en Breugel municipal environmental plan, first amendment to Breeakker-northern section'. If this decision is not taken or is not taken in time, the right of first refusal will lapse.
On October 7, 2025, your council decided to release the 'draft amendment to the environmental plan for the municipality of Son en Breugel, first amendment to the northern part of Breeakker' for the period of opinions from October 10, 2025, to November 20, 2025. The consultation period yielded 130 opinions.
In addition to a summary of the opinions, the memorandum of opinions also contains the response/reply. Officially requested amendments have also been put forward. Proposals for amendments to the 'draft amendment to the environmental plan for the municipality of Son en Breugel, first amendment to the northern part of Breeakker' are indicated in the memorandum of opinions.
These amendments have been incorporated into the 'Amendment to the Son en Breugel municipal environmental plan, first amendment to the northern part of Breeakker'. To complete the process, the 'statement of opinions' and the 'amendment to the environmental plan for the municipality of Son en Breugel, first amendment to the northern part of Breeakker' must be submitted to the municipal council for approval. After the council's approval decision, the appeal procedure will be initiated.

The council decides:

take note of the 'statement of views on the draft amendment to the environmental plan for the municipality of Son en Breugel, first amendment to Breeakker-northern part';
take note of the 'amendment to the environmental plan for the municipality of Son en Breugel, first amendment Breeakker-northern part';
propose to the council that it adopt the "memorandum of views on the draft amendment to the Son en Breugel municipal environmental plan, first amendment to the northern part of Breeakker" and the "amendment to the Son en Breugel municipal environmental plan, first amendment to the northern part of Breeakker."

6. Status of demolition and reconstruction of Braecklant community center

The council provides information about the status of the demolition and reconstruction of the Braecklant community center in a council information letter.

The council decides to adopt the text about the status of the demolition and reconstruction of the Braecklant community center and to include it in the next council information letter.

7. Decision on objection to refusal of environmental permit for tree felling

On July 21, 2025, the council decides to refuse the environmental permit for felling three trees at Röntgenlaan 3 in Son en Breugel. On August 29, 2025, the council receives an objection from the objector against the above decision. The appeals committee recommends that the appeal be upheld and the contested decision be revoked, on the understanding that the refusal of the environmental permit does not apply to the tree with a trunk diameter of less than 15 cm, measured at 1.30 m above ground level.

The council decides:

Declare the objection well-founded;
to revoke the contested decision, on the understanding that the refusal of the environmental permit does not relate to the tree with a trunk diameter of less than 15 cm. For the rest, the contested decision remains in force; 3. to refer to the opinion of the appeals committee for the reasons for the decision.

Manage cookie settings